<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nikon 70-210mm f/4-5.6 AF Impressions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.effguide.com/2009/06/nikon-70-210mm-f4-5-6-af-impressions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.effguide.com/2009/06/nikon-70-210mm-f4-5-6-af-impressions/</link>
	<description>The Original Blogazine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 23:39:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: G</title>
		<link>http://www.effguide.com/2009/06/nikon-70-210mm-f4-5-6-af-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-147</link>
		<dc:creator>G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 03:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.effguide.com/?p=622#comment-147</guid>
		<description>Hi Nicholas! Thanks for pointing that out. It was an oversight on my part and it&#039;s now been fixed =)

I do agree about the importance of VR/IS on the long end though. This lens is hard to use in low light at max zoom without a tripod!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Nicholas! Thanks for pointing that out. It was an oversight on my part and it&#8217;s now been fixed =)</p>
<p>I do agree about the importance of VR/IS on the long end though. This lens is hard to use in low light at max zoom without a tripod!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicholas Leong</title>
		<link>http://www.effguide.com/2009/06/nikon-70-210mm-f4-5-6-af-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-146</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas Leong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 02:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.effguide.com/?p=622#comment-146</guid>
		<description>A classic indeed :) 

By the way, the link for the AF 70-300mm VR is wrong, and the review on Ken Rockwell is for the AF-S 70-300mm VR. I don&#039;t think there is an older 70-300mm with VR. 

The 70-300mm VR is definitely more than RM500, I think it is now RM1900 or so. If you are looking for one below RM500, then it could be the 70-300mm, without VR. 

But 300mm without VR, you better hope for really really good weather :) And that lens work well only if you stop down to f8 at 300mm. 

Have fun playing with the 70-210mm :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A classic indeed <img src='http://www.effguide.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>By the way, the link for the AF 70-300mm VR is wrong, and the review on Ken Rockwell is for the AF-S 70-300mm VR. I don&#8217;t think there is an older 70-300mm with VR. </p>
<p>The 70-300mm VR is definitely more than RM500, I think it is now RM1900 or so. If you are looking for one below RM500, then it could be the 70-300mm, without VR. </p>
<p>But 300mm without VR, you better hope for really really good weather <img src='http://www.effguide.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  And that lens work well only if you stop down to f8 at 300mm. </p>
<p>Have fun playing with the 70-210mm <img src='http://www.effguide.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
